Wednesday, September 21, 2005

I SAW IT ON TV: Don't call it a comeback...

it's the return of LOST.

Okay, so the first ep of season 2 has come...
The good -
Things moved forward, we get to see inside the hatch/hole
I liked the beginning, I thought it was a flashback, but was surprised to see it was indeed the hatch occupant

The maybe not-so-good -

Speaking of flashbacks, do we really need them now? Season one they served a purpose, telling the story of the cast, how they got to where they were, etc. All very necessary and worthwhile. But now? It just seems that continuing to tell every episode in that fashion would either require the writers to stretch plausibility to keep them relevant, or have them just be endless filler with backstory that's not really necessary. We'll see...

The weird (cause it wouldn't be LOST without the weird) -What's up with Desmond being the dude in the hatch? In Jack's flashback we went back a few years, give or take, but all the items shown in the opening sequence were circa late 70's, early 80's, how does that work out??

Take a spin 'round the Lost forums on and see what's buzzin HERE

No comments: